See your post exactly as the feed shows it — including where the …see more fold cuts it off. Uses the same 210-character fold our scoring rubric references, so preview and score always agree.
Your Name · 1st
Your headline · now
Desktop shows roughly the first 210 characters (~3 lines) before truncation; mobile cuts earlier — 140 here is an approximation, the exact cutoff varies by device. Counts are mechanical facts, not a quality judgment — for calibrated 1–100 scoring, use the Post Analyzer.
A perfect fold position cannot rescue a weak opening — and a brilliant hook can lose to bad placement. HooklyAI scores the writing itself, with calibration we publish openly.
Toggle between a typical draft and its strengthened edit. Every number below is computed in your browser by the same deterministic scorer the analyzer uses — not a screenshot, not a stock graphic.
What the feed shows before …see more (210 chars)
I am happy to share some exciting news about my professional journey. In today's world, networking is very important for everyone, and I have learned a lot during my time working on various projects. I want to tell you all about my experience with professional development and the growth opportunities that I have encountered along the way. Hard work always pays off, and I am grateful for everything I have learned from my team and my managers over the past few years.…see more
Live output from the same deterministic scorer that powers the analyzer — not a screenshot.
Six published dimensions, hard quality gates, methodology in the open. How scoring works
LinkedIn does not show your whole post in the feed. Long posts get truncated after roughly the first 210 characters on desktop — about three lines — with an ellipsis and a “see more” link. On mobile, where the majority of LinkedIn sessions happen, the cutoff arrives even earlier. Everything below that line is invisible until a reader actively chooses to expand.
That choice is the whole game. A reader who clicks “see more” has just done two things: they have signaled genuine interest, and they have started a dwell session on your post — time spent actively reading rather than scrolling past. Dwell time is one of the engagement behaviors LinkedIn's ranking system is known to observe. But the deeper truth is simpler: most readers never click through on a mediocre opening. Whatever is above the fold effectively is your post.
This is also why the fold number is not arbitrary in our system. Our scoring rubric's first dimension — hook strength — explicitly asks whether the opening grabs attention within 210 characters, the same number this preview uses. When the analyzer tells you your hook scores 58, and this tool shows you exactly which 210 characters it is judging, the two tools are talking about the same thing. No other preview tool and no other scorer makes that promise, because no other scorer publishes its calibration at all.
The openings that consistently earn the expand fall into recognizable patterns, and our hook generator encodes six of them: the question that creates a gap the reader needs closed; the bold statement that stakes a claim worth arguing with; the story opening that drops you mid-scene; the statistic that quantifies a problem; the contrarian take that challenges a default belief; and the relatable observation that makes someone feel seen. What they share is specificity — a number, a named stake, a concrete moment — inside the visible zone.
The most common failure is the opposite: a warm-up. “In today's fast-paced business environment” spends 50 characters saying nothing, and by the time the actual point appears, it is behind the fold talking to nobody. If your preview shows generic filler in the visible zone, cut it — the post often starts better at its second sentence.
Formatting matters here too. A bolded key phrase inside the visible zone acts as a visual anchor for skimmers deciding whether to invest attention. Keep it to one anchor — emphasis everywhere is emphasis nowhere.
The desktop feed gives a post about three lines before truncating. Mobile gives less — commonly around 140 characters, though the exact number varies with device, font size, and app version, which is why our mobile view is labeled an approximation rather than a precise constant. LinkedIn has never published an official cutoff, and any tool claiming a single exact mobile number is guessing.
The practical rule holds regardless of device: put the hook in the first line and the justification in the second. If your post only works when the reader sees 400 characters, it does not work. Test the draft in the mobile view — if the visible slice still makes someone curious, you have a hook that survives the feed.
Thirty seconds, no account, nothing uploaded.
Drop your post text into the editor. Nothing is uploaded — the preview renders locally in your browser.
Desktop truncates near 210 characters; mobile cuts earlier. Check both, because most of your network scrolls on a phone.
Ask one question: would someone click "see more" based only on what is visible? If the hook, the tension, or the payoff sits below the fold, move it up.
The preview shows placement, not quality. Send the post to the analyzer for a calibrated 1–100 score across seven dimensions — with the reasoning shown.
The fold mechanics, honestly explained.
On desktop, LinkedIn shows roughly the first 210 characters of a post — about three lines — before truncating it with an ellipsis and a "see more" link. Mobile feeds truncate earlier (commonly around 140 characters), and the exact cutoff varies by device and app version. This preview tool uses the same 210-character fold our scoring rubric references, so the preview and the score always agree.
Clicking "see more" is a dwell-time signal: the reader chose to stay on your post, and LinkedIn's ranking system observes how long people engage. More importantly, most readers never click through a weak opening at all — so what sits above the fold decides whether the rest of your post even gets a chance. Write the first 210 characters as if they are the whole post, because for most of your network they are.
Yes — it runs in your browser, is completely free, and requires no signup. Your text never leaves your device. For calibrated 1–100 post scoring with published methodology, HooklyAI's free plan includes 30 scored generation requests per month.
The feed simulation approximates LinkedIn's desktop and mobile truncation behavior, but the platform does not publish exact cutoffs and adjusts rendering by device, font size, and app version. Use the preview as a reliable planning tool — the desktop fold at 210 characters matches what our scorer references — and treat minor differences as rendering variance, not a bug.
A counter tells you how long your post is; a preview shows you what readers actually see before they decide whether to keep reading. This tool renders the truncation itself — the fold, the ellipsis, the see-more click — on desktop and mobile, so you can place your strongest sentence where the scroll stops. Then HooklyAI's analyzer scores whether those visible characters are strong enough to earn the click.
HooklyAI's analyzer grades your post 1–100 across six calibrated dimensions, shows its reasoning, and hard-caps engagement bait at 60. Free plan: 30 scored requests a month.
Explore more free LinkedIn tools from Hookly AI